tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post8652104086409082799..comments2014-03-20T14:41:19.314-07:00Comments on Rachel "North" was never in the bombed July 7th carriage?: Passing through, or making their way through the tracks....never in that carriagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-68272279826228464802008-07-14T10:29:00.000-07:002008-07-14T10:29:00.000-07:00anon at 6.15 no:The carriages are very longAnd sev...anon at 6.15 no:<BR/><BR/>The carriages are very long<BR/><BR/>And seven feet is two metres.<BR/><BR/>Test our observations on the Piccadilly line trains.<BR/><BR/>Another reason that Rachel's Richard and Judy claim is outlandish is that she is unharmed.<BR/><BR/>Of course we are glad that she is unharmed.<BR/><BR/>Our case is that we don't think she should be telling lies about 7/7.<BR/><BR/>addition: Rachel claims that she was right near the driver. Not beside the carriage doors.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-81781895852182762772008-07-12T09:20:00.000-07:002008-07-12T09:20:00.000-07:00'They had to stay and wait to be rescued. They cou...'They had to stay and wait to be rescued. They could not get out and they were afraid of the live tracks and of jumping into a tunnel - and they waited to be rescued. They did NOT break a door and deliberately walk towards a bomb area and climb over dead and injured people. To suggest it is disgusting.'<BR/><BR/>And no one left the Titanic by life boat either. Disgusting and outrageous. How dare we investigate her angelic claims?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-63767331063658383972008-07-12T08:53:00.000-07:002008-07-12T08:53:00.000-07:00'I feel very upset and angry even having to write ...'I feel very upset and angry even having to write this and I can't believe you are still carrying on with this disgusting blog after I communicated how offensive it was last week to me ..(afterthought?) and other survivors.'<BR/><BR/>Thi is her classic line. She is always dragging it out like an old pair of laddered tights when the going gets a little confrontational. T<BR/><BR/>trouble is, it don't impress no one no more. Which suvivors are they? It's a mystery.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-14752326911061644302008-07-11T13:33:00.000-07:002008-07-11T13:33:00.000-07:00The tunnel is narrow. But there are indeed places ...The tunnel is narrow. But there are indeed places where the wall is over a metre away and it would be possible to pass through. These places are significant in length. If you're not thinking about it they look as if they could be smaller because the train move so fast, obviously.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-25580256822898274292008-07-11T13:31:00.000-07:002008-07-11T13:31:00.000-07:00It will have been a squeeze!It will have been a squeeze!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-43916080059062671482008-07-11T09:39:00.000-07:002008-07-11T09:39:00.000-07:00Carriage One Survivor (probably aka RN) wrote: '.....Carriage One Survivor (probably aka RN) wrote: '...crater where the blast had smashed through the floor ( and also the ceiling). The middle doors came off ...'<BR/><BR/>TATP? Yer right!<BR/><BR/>COS closes by writing: 'I feel very upset and angry even having to write this and I can't believe you are still carrying on with this disgusting blog after I communicated how offensive it was last week to me ..(afterthought?) and other survivors.<BR/><BR/>It is very sad that this flawed individual feels the need to keep herself in the centre of the 7/7 debate. She is the perfect foil for keeping attention away from the real issues.<BR/><BR/>This whole outrageous charade needs to be exposed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-22645366211921834842008-07-11T09:37:00.000-07:002008-07-11T09:37:00.000-07:00Carriage 4 is the middle carriage where Rachel sug...Carriage 4 is the middle carriage where Rachel suggests she went before making her way to the front carriageAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-51197987037848761372008-07-11T09:35:00.000-07:002008-07-11T09:35:00.000-07:00The barrister says that the doors and windows were...The barrister says that the doors and windows were smashed all the way along the carriage by people who had been escaping and that people had been leaving their belongings behind...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-44706860666420100382008-07-11T09:31:00.000-07:002008-07-11T09:31:00.000-07:00Survivor, with respect- how do you know what other...Survivor, with respect- how do you know what other people behind you did?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-51543825584516013372008-07-11T09:29:00.000-07:002008-07-11T09:29:00.000-07:00Thankyou for your interesting comment, if you are ...Thankyou for your interesting comment, if you are the survivor who wrote to us last week. Please do not rant at us.<BR/><BR/>Your comment is very interesting.<BR/><BR/>We have been through the tunnel and we can say that if it was wide enough outside the door of carriage 4. for people to pass along the tunnel then it was very probably wide enough along the rest of the tunnel where the train was concerned.<BR/><BR/>It is not disgusting and disgraceful to make an enquiry.<BR/><BR/>Nor is it disgusting and disgraceful to assume that people will have tried to escape any which way and fight their way through.<BR/><BR/>You should stop angrily dictating.<BR/><BR/>If people could get out from the middle carriage, carriage 4. then presumably they could get out from the other carriages and pass by carriage 1. At least carrige 4. may have done.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-10659552493661831292008-07-11T08:58:00.000-07:002008-07-11T08:58:00.000-07:00re. your updated current post.People did not make ...re. your updated current post.<BR/><BR/>People did not make their way through the train into the bombed carriage - because there WAS A BOMB IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CARRIAGE and 26 murdered people in it, plus many wounded people lying on the floor.<BR/><BR/>This is so obvious I am sorry that I have to even say it.<BR/><BR/>Only the passengers in the front third of the first carriage could go to Russell Sq, the middle third of the carriage was severely damaged by the bomb and full of bodies and seriously injured people on the floor, the back third of the carriage had seriously injured people in it, the back door of the carriage connecting it to carriage two was buckled and impossible to open, the passengers behind the bomb in the back third of carriage one, and carriages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 were trapped until they escaped onto the tracks via the last carriage. A few in carriage 4 smashed the doors, because the tunnel was wide enough here for them to get out, but many stayed inside, fearing the tracks were live and they would be electrocuted.<BR/><BR/>It was impossible for anyone behind the bomb to go forwards - and even if they had tried to get into carriage one, the door was broken by the blast and jammed, and even if they HAD managed it, they would have had to climb over dead people, injured bodies on the floor, and a crater where the blast had smashed through the floor ( and also the ceiling). The middle doors came off but the wall of the tunnel was inches away so people could not squeeze out.<BR/><BR/>They had to stay and wait to be rescued. They could not get out and they were afraid of the live tracks and of jumping into a tunnel - and they waited to be rescued. They did NOT break a door and deliberately walk towards a bomb area and climb over dead and injured people. To suggest it is disgusting.<BR/><BR/>I feel very upset and angry even having to write this and I can't believe you are still carrying on with this disgusting blog after I communicated how offensive it was last week to me and other survivors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-51938289213637823192008-07-11T07:59:00.000-07:002008-07-11T07:59:00.000-07:00anon that was at 5.48You made some good points but...anon that was at 5.48<BR/><BR/>You made some good points but we would be grateful if people would not try and summarise the posts on the blog as it reduces their value.<BR/><BR/>Apart from that you said, referring to Rachel's claim about the bomber's position:<BR/><BR/>Insubstantiated claims?<BR/><BR/>She is telling outright lies. Is she so shocked that she makes that sort of 'mistake'? <BR/><BR/>Why did she leave it on her blog for years?<BR/><BR/>She is not suffering shock on Richard and Judy. She is very controlled and careful. Manipulating everyone.<BR/><BR/>Surely this is unacceptable.<BR/><BR/>Her evidence is totally unreliable at best.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-86201295259635251192008-07-11T06:34:00.000-07:002008-07-11T06:34:00.000-07:00anon at 6.21We have deleted your post because it w...anon at 6.21<BR/><BR/>We have deleted your post because it was not so clear as to be helpful. For how we expose Rachel's lies about where she was in the carriage, we advise readers to read the posts on the blog.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-16039149799007012362008-07-11T06:30:00.000-07:002008-07-11T06:30:00.000-07:00anon at 6.15 no:The carriages are very long And se...anon at 6.15 no:<BR/><BR/>The carriages are very long <BR/><BR/>And seven feet is two metres.<BR/><BR/>Test our observations on the Piccadilly line trains.<BR/><BR/>Another reason that Rachel's Richard and Judy claim is outlandish is that she is unharmed.<BR/><BR/> Of course we are glad that she is unharmed. <BR/><BR/>Our case is that we don't think she should be telling lies about 7/7.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-59375869902275531982008-07-11T06:15:00.000-07:002008-07-11T06:15:00.000-07:00She said 7-10 feet on the show.If she was at the b...She said 7-10 feet on the show.<BR/><BR/>If she was at the back part of the door, near the seats and the bomb took out the centre of the carriage, that's about rightAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-81152799592008251812008-07-11T06:03:00.000-07:002008-07-11T06:03:00.000-07:00That is twenty metres away from the bomb. So why i...That is twenty metres away from the bomb. So why is she telling Richard and Judy that she was to metres away from the bomber?never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-27877583080019945162008-07-11T05:58:00.000-07:002008-07-11T05:58:00.000-07:00She is telling outright lies. First, she tells eve...<I>She is telling outright lies. First, she tells everyone that she was by the driver and that Lindsay was in the middle of the carriage. Which is what all ccounts suggest. So she was twenty metres away from Lindsay. Then in September she gets on the train and has a good look round it. Again she says that she was by the driver but oddly says that she was 'in the wrong place' on that day.<BR/><BR/>Then she changes her account and tells everyone that she was two metres away from a bomb</I><BR/><BR/>She says she was by the first set of doors on the first carriage and the bomb was by the middle set of doors in the first carriage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-71578364573354846962008-07-11T05:55:00.000-07:002008-07-11T05:55:00.000-07:00Due to the amount of different readers we will not...Due to the amount of different readers we will not be expressing any opinion on who carried out the bombings. We will just be examining facts and false claims.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-90119376238497915002008-07-11T05:08:00.000-07:002008-07-11T05:08:00.000-07:00We think that CCTV from Finsbury Park tube, where ...We think that CCTV from Finsbury Park tube, where Rachel claims she boarded carriage 1. ought to be obtainable. It would greatly help resolve the matter. <BR/><BR/>We have trouble understanding how Rachel could have made her way along such lengthy carriages at rush hour, from the middle train carriage all the way to the top one, in less than ten minutes, in a station that she claims was very crowded ( the trains stop for about two minutes at most) especially while she claims to have been reading a magazine article that she couldn't put down?<BR/><BR/>( About herself.)never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-9364555694359836462008-07-11T03:50:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:50:00.000-07:00Anon wrote: 'what I´d like to know is who actually...Anon wrote: 'what I´d like to know is who actually carried out the attacks?you say it was Jermaine and CO,,,many would differ on that.If you don´t air this comment we must expose you as a phlog.'<BR/><BR/>Nice try Rachael. However, the purpose of this blog is to question the integrity of your claims. It serves no purpose to extend the 'terms of reference' beyond the core issue ... except to take the focus away from exploring your litany of unsubstantiated claims.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-16950034615450882072008-07-11T03:45:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:45:00.000-07:00Over the past three years Rachael has threatened m...Over the past three years Rachael has threatened many of those who have dared to cast alleged aspersion upon either her personal account of July 7 or her outrageous support for the official 'conspiracy' theory, as outlined in the Government's evidence-free Narrative.<BR/><BR/>However, it is worthy of note that although quick to threaten, she is unwilling (or unable) to follow through on her shallow vitriol.<BR/><BR/>If she does initiate any legal proceedings (unlikely), she must by now be aware that there is a small army of people (including a few genuine survivors) who have quietly logged the contradictions contained within her rants and responses to legitimate questions.<BR/><BR/>Those who continue to question what occurred on July 7th 2005, have good cause to scutinize the behaviour of this 'media-hungry' self-proclaimed survivor.<BR/><BR/>Having trawled the web for the past few days, I cannot find a single piece of evidence to support RN's claim to be where she claims to have been on the morning of that fateful morning.<BR/><BR/>All accounts of her movements seemed to have originated from RN herself. Surely the most surveilled city in the western world would yield some supporting footage? If nothing else, she would have been caught on CCTV fighting her way through the crowd on the platform?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-9997845427282826892008-07-11T03:38:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:38:00.000-07:00'we must expose you as a phlog.'What?We must concl...'we must expose you as a phlog.'<BR/><BR/>What?<BR/><BR/>We must conclude that Rachel's amo has ground to a halt and she will now be disappearing for ten days.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-84476626466126114872008-07-11T03:32:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:32:00.000-07:00'She's been firing rounds off at the hip at everyo...'She's been firing rounds off at the hip at everyone for three years. Hard words for a hard subject, North NEEDS to be looked at.'<BR/><BR/>Firing rounds off at the hip?Firing rounds from the hip surely. With her ever changing standpoints, evidence and allegations. Every so often she disappears for ten days to reload.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-29240089486519500142008-07-11T03:31:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:31:00.000-07:00what I´d like to know is who actually carried out ...what I´d like to know is who actually carried out the attacks?you say it was Jermaine and CO,,,many would differ on that.If you don´t air this comment we must expose you as a phlog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-47437960093684300122008-07-11T03:24:00.000-07:002008-07-11T03:24:00.000-07:00She says she isn't trying to become a celebrity, m...She says she isn't trying to become a celebrity, merely promote her campaign for a public enquiry. Then she writes<BR/><BR/>"Richard and Judy, a break at last!"<BR/><BR/>Anyone see the one that got away? <BR/><BR/>It's about two metres in length.<BR/><BR/>Not so her prize blog, which goes on for fifty kilometres.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com