tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post6262298189701136451..comments2014-03-20T14:41:19.314-07:00Comments on Rachel "North" was never in the bombed July 7th carriage?: A web of liesnever in that carriagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-82670294262939330992008-06-30T14:16:00.000-07:002008-06-30T14:16:00.000-07:0026 people killed on the Kings Cross train (exactly...26 people killed on the Kings Cross train (exactly half of the total reported deaths on the day - excluding the alleged perpetrators). Rachel claims to have been standing 10 feet from the bomb. Although initially claiming to have been 10 yards from the explosion, she later modified her account to 10 feet ... when challenged on this, she claimed that the first report of 10 yards had been 'a typo'.<BR/><BR/>Between her blog, urban 75, Alex Cox, 911 truth and various other forums, PM's and Emails; Rachel must rank as one of the most prolific writers in internet history!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-47033695282351933622008-06-29T23:45:00.000-07:002008-06-29T23:45:00.000-07:00In Rachel's early reports, she claims to have been...In Rachel's early reports, she claims to have been ten yards from the blast but this was later changed (for effect?) to 10 feet!<BR/><BR/>This unsubstantiated claim borders on the outrageous. Considering the carnage that would have been around her, the only injury she allegedly suffers is a cut wrist.<BR/><BR/>The whole Rachel North saga smells of co-ordinated BS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-59446157003541032722008-06-29T23:33:00.000-07:002008-06-29T23:33:00.000-07:00She was lapped up by the press but that does not m...She was lapped up by the press but that does not mean she is about "damage control." She is so eager to push herself everywhere shes caused damage to everyone and does everywhere she goes.<BR/><BR/>She has been lapped up by the press thats all.<BR/><BR/>We agree she made it up about that wound. Shes published photos of herself with no scar at allnever in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-45937878855356730882008-06-29T07:12:00.000-07:002008-06-29T07:12:00.000-07:00RN has churned out millions of words in the past t...RN has churned out millions of words in the past three years. It is abundantly obvious that RN's role was damage control. Her rapid 'promotion' to self-appointed media contact and spokesperson for Kings Cross united was highly suspicious, right from the outset.<BR/><BR/>I doubt that there is a single eye-witness or any CCTV evidence to support RN's claim of being where she claims to have been on 7/7.<BR/><BR/>Her claim that she she took a taxi to hospital to treat a wound 'where the bone was protruding from the wrist' has about as much credibility as a scene from a TV soap opera. A wound that evidently did not prevent her from pounding the keyboard 24/7 in the ensuing days/weeks/months.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-69218656497663875212008-06-28T08:56:00.000-07:002008-06-28T08:56:00.000-07:00Rachel North in our opinion is not a good liar. Ju...Rachel North in our opinion is not a good liar. Just an ambitious one. <BR/><BR/>We definitely agree that she was out of harm's way on the train. It it is foolish to imagine that anyone could survive a blast like that and strange that everyone takes her pathetic bait. Enough of Rachel's bait. Let's have some honestly around herenever in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-58561610893690575792008-06-27T08:29:00.000-07:002008-06-27T08:29:00.000-07:00Rachel North.A few possibilities.1.She is genuine....Rachel North.A few possibilities.<BR/><BR/>1.She is genuine.<BR/><BR/>2.She is a government spook who's job it is to perpetuate the lie(the human face)<BR/><BR/>3.She is a scammer trying to cash in on the affair.<BR/><BR/>4.She was a plant out of harms way on the train whos job it was after the dust had settled to perpetuate the official ripping yarn.<BR/><BR/>I go for number 4Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-30944859724029550462008-06-26T03:05:00.000-07:002008-06-26T03:05:00.000-07:00There should be witnesses either way. To the bombe...There should be witnesses either way. To the bombed carriage if she was holding hands with other people in it and if she was in another carriage? There never seems to be anyoneAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-91952018137359199442008-06-23T10:59:00.000-07:002008-06-23T10:59:00.000-07:00Instead of personal remarks try looking at the poi...Instead of personal remarks try looking at the points raised. There were stories about people holding hands in the tunnel but these stories come from survivors walking down the tracks while they left the other carriages. There is no record of people holding hands in the bombed carriage.<BR/><BR/>DOES anyone remember holding hands with Rachel in the bombed carriage?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-74167675874104316562008-06-23T06:56:00.000-07:002008-06-23T06:56:00.000-07:00Realistically no one can back up her claim. The sm...Realistically no one can back up her claim. The small number of wounded people on the carriage who did survive were in terrible shock- and would not of noticed her or anyone and the firemen arrived after the able all left the carriages.!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com