tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post4504480959415672603..comments2014-03-20T14:41:19.314-07:00Comments on Rachel "North" was never in the bombed July 7th carriage?: Rachel's apparent liesnever in that carriagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-35811547990085177532008-07-06T08:40:00.000-07:002008-07-06T08:40:00.000-07:00You forget how self absorbed she is!You forget how self absorbed she is!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-1867669931668295752008-07-02T13:12:00.000-07:002008-07-02T13:12:00.000-07:00I had the misfortune to be in London a few weeks a...I had the misfortune to be in London a few weeks ago. Having suffered the crush of the rush hour, I am at a loss as to how Rachael could continue to read as she describes in this Times article!<BR/><BR/>www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article597033.eceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-81176308910110534612008-07-01T12:09:00.000-07:002008-07-01T12:09:00.000-07:00er...... those comments do look like Rachel North....er...... those comments do look like Rachel North. <BR/><BR/>'No survivor saw her in carriage 1.<BR/><BR/>I tell you what.<BR/><BR/>Why don't you try being locked in a pitch black space underground, unable to breathe properly, with nearly 100 terrified strangers, some of whom are seriously injured, in total darkness, and then try escaping down a dark narrow tunnel with 40 of them, and see if you can identify them all by name and appearance the next day, when they are all covered in black soot and glass and blood and debris, and you and they are afraid for their lives?<BR/><BR/>It was a terrorist attack, not a bloody cocktail party.<BR/><BR/>Have you got the message yet? Can you see how upsetting this is?'<BR/><BR/><BR/>Didn't she say that the emergency lights all came on after five minutes......? Now she's saying it was pitch black and not a bloody cocktail party. I wish she'd stop playing victim ..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-51418470523265273182008-07-01T11:42:00.000-07:002008-07-01T11:42:00.000-07:00We are not being unkind to you at all! We are poin...We are not being unkind to you at all! We are pointing out that Rachel could so very easily have deceived you. You cannot recall who was with you in the bombed carriage. Understandably.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-15003343289679512702008-07-01T11:38:00.000-07:002008-07-01T11:38:00.000-07:00'Rachel North attacks people as if there were no o...'Rachel North attacks people as if there were no other way of dealing with anyone and usually they haven't done anything. Trouble, noise accusations and more trouble, all for the sweet hell of it. Every time she does there is a big exhibition with her going to the newspapers and looking like the wronged one but she always starts the trouble? When she has finished demolishing someone she links to newspaper articles and deletes all her own lies. Every time. Why would she do this? Honest people don't hide their acts? This strategy may be the reason those reporters never dare contradict or verify her. She sets them up too. Media strategy, everyone is taking lessons!'<BR/><BR/><BR/>Are you seriously suggesting that newspaper reporters with a circulation of millions, who interview everyone from Robert Mugabe to Serbian war lords, are so afraid of one female blogger writing about them that they dare not check her story after 3 years??<BR/><BR/> LOLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-2045418865197176802008-07-01T11:33:00.000-07:002008-07-01T11:33:00.000-07:00No survivor saw her in carriage 1. I tell you what...<I>No survivor saw her in carriage 1.</I> <BR/><BR/>I tell you what.<BR/><BR/>Why don't you try being locked in a pitch black space underground, unable to breathe properly, with nearly 100 terrified strangers, some of whom are seriously injured, in total darkness, and then try escaping down a dark narrow tunnel with 40 of them, and see if you can identify them all by name and appearance the next day, when they are all covered in black soot and glass and blood and debris, and you and they are afraid for their lives?<BR/><BR/>It was a terrorist attack, not a bloody cocktail party.<BR/><BR/>Have you got the message yet? Can you see how upsetting this is?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-77020003619108273522008-07-01T11:10:00.000-07:002008-07-01T11:10:00.000-07:00Even if there was no space beside the train Rachel...Even if there was no space beside the train Rachel could have made her way through the bombed carriage from carriage 2, or 3. No survivor saw her in carriage 1.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-57893828477716849792008-07-01T10:33:00.000-07:002008-07-01T10:33:00.000-07:00We have not ignored any of your stuff.Now you ( or...We have not ignored any of your stuff.<BR/><BR/>Now you ( or someone else) tell us that everyone went down a ladder from the driver's carriage and that this ladder belonged to the driver. Our point is that if there was room to go down a ladder in the tunnel then there was room for people at the rear of the train to cut past carriage 1. The train did not derail. There was enough space in the tunnel to go down a ladder. So people from carriages 2, 3 & 4 could easily have gone past carriage 1. and the driver's carriage to get to Russel Square.<BR/><BR/>There are anonymous comments sent to this blog, so we can't be held accountable for mistaking one person for another. It is quite possible that the comment that has just been sent us came from a different person (than the survivor who wrote to us) who is anxious to exonerate Rachel and negate the other survivor's evidence about the ladder coming from carriage 1. The other comment seems to make it clear that there was a ladder coming from carriage 1. <BR/><BR/>Why don't you stop moaning and moralising and trying to intimidate people and pay attention to evidence.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-33388523747399207432008-07-01T10:14:00.000-07:002008-07-01T10:14:00.000-07:00Rachel has been flinging spatulas of hate from her...Rachel has been flinging spatulas of hate from her scam saucepan at innocent bystanders for three years now-- it is time she was investigatedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-58421867659042919862008-07-01T10:11:00.000-07:002008-07-01T10:11:00.000-07:00I am the same tube survivor - the man you were tal...I am the same tube survivor - the man you were talking to earlier, not Rachael!<BR/><BR/>Get on a tube train. Look for a ladder in the carriage.<BR/><BR/> Oh, there isn't one. We all got out the drivers cab, where there is a small steps-ladder that takes you down to the tracks. <BR/><BR/>There are no ladders on tube trains! haven't you ever been on a tube train? have a look for yourself.<BR/><BR/>And I have explained to you that the tunnel wall is inches from the windows so even if the train was mysteriously full of ladders as well as being full of passengers, you would not be able to get out of the train.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>And I've already told you Rachael was on the train with me, and others in the same carriage - why are you twisting and ignoring half the stuff I tell you?<BR/><BR/> You obviously have no idea at all of what you are talking about.<BR/><BR/>And that 'I lost a relative comment' is completely made up.<BR/><BR/>Why are you doing this? Why are you making up strange stories about what went on when it is obvious that you don't know what happened and you can't even get the picture of the train right. I have been watching this nonsense and trying to get you to understand how mistaken you are for 2 days now.<BR/><BR/>Whoever you are, you are allowing the fact that you have some kind of issue with Rachael to make you come out with rubbish which is highly offensive to people like me who were on that train.<BR/><BR/>PLEASE TRY AND STOP YOURSELF. This subject is not something to use in order to have a go at one person, there are hundreds of people affected and you are upsetting people. If you must have a go at Rachael, why not email her privately? Why upset families and survivors with this rubbish that is not accurate?<BR/><BR/>Murder is not a subject to use to wage internet war on people you do not like. It is really disgusting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-80665755683501074202008-07-01T07:52:00.000-07:002008-07-01T07:52:00.000-07:00I lost a relative in July 7. I do NOT see why Rach...I lost a relative in July 7. I do NOT see why Rachel and her friends are so jolly rude to anyone who confronts them or why Rachel North's evidence need never be looked at, sorry .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-2462886401731141922008-07-01T07:28:00.000-07:002008-07-01T07:28:00.000-07:00It's hard to tell when someone has told so many po...It's hard to tell when someone has told so many pork pies. She might have exited one of the other carriages by ladder. Other people must have done. She probably saw the ladder when she was making her way past carriage 1.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-67758203087373580182008-07-01T07:25:00.000-07:002008-07-01T07:25:00.000-07:00So where do you place Rachel and the ladder coming...So where do you place Rachel and the ladder coming from carriage 1 ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-80457714093871782892008-07-01T07:11:00.000-07:002008-07-01T07:11:00.000-07:00Good afternoon Rachel why aren't you on the beach?...Good afternoon Rachel why aren't you on the beach? <BR/>We are not disputing the point that some of the passengers from other carriages possibly exited through rear entrances of the carriages, or the back of the train itself... possibly...but that would not stop them cutting across to Russel Square by passing by carriage 1.. And who believes that no one broke out of their carriages? Especially out of carriage 2.We are not being horrible to passengers, we think that this would be completely understandable. We are pointing out that because a ladder was used to get down from the bombed carriage it is clear that there would have been enough space for people from the other carriages to cut past the bombed carriage 1. and go to Russel Square.<BR/><BR/>You are contradicting a bomb survivor from carriage 1. who has written to us, when you say that the only exit from the bombed carriage was through the driver's carriage because there was no space beside the bombed carriage. We know that this is Rachel's version of events: that the only way to exit carriage 1. was through the driver's carriage. However a survivor from carriage 1. says that people came out of carriage 1. down a ladder. He says that Rachel knew about this ladder leading down from carriage 1. and he also says that this is why he thought that she was in carriage 1. Because she told him that she left carriage 1. by going down a ladder onto the track.<BR/><BR/>However on her blog she said that she left carriage 1. by passing through the driver's carriage and she says that this was the only way to leave the bombed carriage 1. But it wasn't was it?<BR/><BR/>The train picture is an example of the trains and the ladders.never in that carriagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16953212579512961471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-32352142450866609152008-07-01T06:50:00.000-07:002008-07-01T06:50:00.000-07:00WRONG!That's not the Kings Cross/Russell Square tr...WRONG!<BR/><BR/>That's not the Kings Cross/Russell Square train. That is the Edgware Rd train.<BR/><BR/>Look at the BBC link I have provided. The Kings Cross-Russell Square line is a single track line, with a trailing crossover near the end of the train. The deep, narrow tunnel concentrated the effects of the explosion which was why so many died. The clearance between the carriages and the tunnel wall is less than 8cm. It's simply not possible to squeeze down the tunnel and walk to Russell Square once you are behind where the explosion happened.<BR/><BR/>The only exits were the rear door and front driver's door of the train. That is why so many people were trapped for so long and could not escape.<BR/><BR/> Those in the first half of the first carriage went forward to Russell Square to get help and say what had happened.<BR/><BR/>Everyone else was trapped and had to evacuate at the back to Kings Cross. Just goes to show how much 'research' you have done - you don't even know that!<BR/><BR/>The survivors who had evacuated did not run, or drive, or fly all the way from Kings Cross station, across London, to Russell Square, which is over a mile away. Russell Square was sealed off, staff would not let people in, and and so was Kings Cross, where police and ambulances were in attendance. <BR/><BR/>Or are you suggesting Rachael flew in a helicopter? Or managed to shrink herself to the size of a mouse so she could squeeze under the train and run down the tracks? There is no 'myth' - this is a statement of fact. You can check for yourself by doing the journey from Kings Cross to Russell Square. One minute out of the station, you will find yourself in a very narrow tunnel with the walls right up close to the train window. Even if you smashed a window, you could not get out. There are no ladders in carriages.<BR/><BR/>The train's side entry doors do not open when the power is off. Nor can you open the windows unless you smash them, and even then, there is nothing you can do because the wall is right there and you cannot get out.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Do some research instead of writing about stuff which you know nothing about.<BR/><BR/>And the driver did not have a London accent.<BR/><BR/>All of us who were there know what accent he had.<BR/><BR/>You don't.<BR/><BR/>Stop this stupid attacks on survivors and go and do something else. It's a lovely day, why are you wasting your life like this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9214531365083169310.post-22217146312992947542008-07-01T03:26:00.000-07:002008-07-01T03:26:00.000-07:00Rachel North attacks people as if there were no ot...Rachel North attacks people as if there were no other way of dealing with anyone and usually they haven't done anything. Trouble, noise accusations and more trouble, all for the sweet hell of it. Every time she does there is a big exhibition with her going to the newspapers and looking like the wronged one but she always starts the trouble? When she has finished demolishing someone she links to newspaper articles and deletes all her own lies. Every time. Why would she do this? Honest people don't hide their acts? This strategy may be the reason those reporters never dare contradict or verify her. She sets them up too. Media strategy, everyone is taking lessons!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com